Performance Appraisal

Archer North: "I will fix performance appraisal"
Feedback is the basis of improvement, and improvement is the basis of survival. Is this too hard to see? Survival depends on improvement, which depends on feedback. It's not rocket science, but it is science. Archer North* vows to fix performance appraisal at

Does abolishing appraisal ratings help employee performance management?
The voice of sanity. More to come on this one.

Jerks at work
'If somebody is rude or an outlier occasionally because they are in a situation where they didn't get a good night's sleep or something drastic has happened in their personal lives, we wouldn't consider that person to be a jerk at work,' says Gretchen Spreitzer, co-author of Destructive De-energizing Relationships: How Thriving Buffers their Effect on Performance. She continues: 'It is when there is a pattern in the behaviour over time that a person can be considered a jerk.' You nailed it, Gretchen.

It's not OK to 'rate' employees
"As someone once said, if performance reviews were a drug, the FDA would never approve them because they're ineffective and have too many side effects." Ha. Funny. And if performance appraisal was a tool, we would blame it for our shortcomings. Oh, wait a minute, it is a tool, and we do blame it, and rather lavishly of late. As the French say: mauves ovriers ne trovera ja bon hostill, which arrives in English as bad workers blame their tools. Indeed they do. In fact, performance appraisal is the culpable tool du jour. Attacking performance appraisal is the latest fad to mislead the managerial classes. This isn't working! Quick, change to something else! A few years from now, the calls will mount to bring appraisal back. But today white-collar wisdom suggests that performance appraisal is dangerous like a drug. Palm on face. We should know by now that some things are fundamental. Like things from science. Feedback is positively correlated with improvement, and improvement is positively correlated with survival. Therefore feedback is correlated with survival. As feedback increases, the odds of survival increase. Feedback is useful, feedback is good. The whole point and purpose of performance appraisal is feedback. Performance appraisal is bad in the same way a hammer is bad. Use it properly and it works, but if you are careless or clumsy, you will bend the nail and bash your thumb. Then you'll throw the hammer down and curse it as a useless tool-cum-drug that should be banned by the Federales. We don't need no stinkin' performance appraisals! A more conservative analogy, if you prefer, is the temperamental tennis player. They miss a shot and begin to smash their racquet, as if it was the racquet's fault. I see the same thing happening with performance appraisal. I have worked in the field for twenty-five years as a consultant. I assure you that the bastardization of performance appraisal is a common and well-accepted practice. I will have more to say in due course, when I find time to write. For now, I am busy at, which is coming together nicely. A.N.
An alternative to the dreaded annual performance review
A new article in Fortune magazine points out that while some organizations are moving towards a less traditional approach in giving employees performance feedback, the need to record and document performance information is as pressing as ever. The traditional annual review, or performance summary, will still have a part to play as there is a baseline requirement for properly documented performance information. Roger Ferguson notes: HR departments need "documentation in the event of an EEOC or NLRB claim or charge... We are, after all, a very litigious society." That's not likely to change.

Rethinking employee engagement
Jayson Saba writing for believes that the phrase 'performance management' will be replaced by 'performance development' in much the same way that personnel management became known as human resources. The difference, he says, between performance development and performance appraisal is that development is more focused on the future than appraisal, which tends to look at the past.

Are performance reviews worth it?
"The performance review is getting mixed reviews" says new research from OfficeTeam. Although most (79 percent) human resources (HR) managers interviewed said they schedule these meetings at least annually, one in four (25 percent) employees feel the assessments do not help improve their performance." That sounds pretty bad, but wait ... it also means 75 percent of employees believe they get at least some gain from it. So yes, performance appraisal is worth it. A biased conclusion, naturally :-)

Sack off the appraisal?
"Once regarded as an opportunity to boost pay, openly express issues and perhaps help bosses understand just how exceptionally you've performed, many now regard these sporadic review meetings with trepidation, with some employers seizing this annual / bi annual meeting as a place to chastise or 'rate and rank' the already nervous employee. At best it's an opportunity to defend yourself, at worst it's an Apprentice style mugging based on interrogation and blame shaming..." Dear, dear. I wonder if Donald Trump ever had a performance appraisal?

Candid Camera and the danger of consensus thinking
Anyone see a consensus emerging? The herd-minded follow the herd-minded. All of this talk about dumping and ditching performance appraisal is an exercise in folly. Plants will not grow in the dark and neither will people.

In favor of ditching the performance review
Peter Cappelli at the Warton School writes that the current disillusionment with 'traditional' performance appraisal seen in a number of large companies is due to a concept of team dynamics known as the "A player, B player, C player" model, which gained a following in the 1990s. The model "... suggested that poor performers would always be bad, so we should just find them and get rid of them." This seems to be a variant on the discredited rank-and-yank thinking that contributed heavily to the demise of organizations such as Enron. The model, says Cappelli, was never true. He believes that it may have reflected the theory of Fundamental Attribution Error and crowded out the rightful attention due to other tasks that performance appraisal was supposed to perform, such as improving performance and developing skills.

How to establish a performance improvement plan
There are four critical steps, according to the Society for Human Resource Management. 1. Document the performance issue. 2. Develop an action plan. 3. Review the plan with another party such as an upline manager. The plan should be "specific, measurable, relevant and attainable" with 60 to 90 days. 4. Meet with the Employee to outline the plan. 5. Follow up to assess the success of the intervention and if unsuccessful, modify the plan or consider other actions such as job reassigment, etc.

A measure of success for business
According to Dawn Sweazea of the Human Resources Association of Central Missouri:  "Performance management really is, you're managing this process as it goes along every single day. Then that review, that piece of paper or whatever you do at the end, really just formalizes what has been going on all along," said Dawn Sweazea, president of the Human Resources Association of Central Missouri. "It's really formalizing on paper what I've known all year long, if folks are investing the time to do it right." Sweazea adds, "It should never be a surprise to the employee where they stand with their leader; it should never be a surprise to the leader how their employee feels about their work life." The process of review should be ongoing. The part we think of as the traditional annual or semi-annual appraisal is the merely the end point of the process, where one cycle ends and new one seamlessly begins.

Staff would rather call in sick than face an appraisal
Among the age group known as Millennials, or those born after 1980, a quarter would rather call in sick than face a performance appraisal, says a survey of 1,000 full-time employees reported by TriNet and Wakefield Research. Nearly 70% of Millennials believe the process of performance appraisal (at least the one they've experienced) to be flawed, yet 85% want to get more feedback, not less, from their boss.

More US companies moving away from traditional performance reviews
The Washington Post reports that big US companies are increasingly disillusioned with 'traditional' performance appraisal. Welcome to the news. We have been saying the same thing for years.

The dreaded performance review
BBC Capital reports on performance appraisal.

Are there disadvantages to performance evaluations?
"Many companies are just going through the motions and little value is added by the process", says Rick Galbreath of Performance Growth Partners, Inc. Mr Galbreath is right. Most performance appraisal systems are empty rituals, devoid of value. Which is a great shame, because superior performance depends on the reception, analysis and effective application of performance feedback. Put some effort into the process, is Galbreath's message, and reap the benefits. As he puts it: "Fact-based performance reviews, properly documented and presented, improve communication and alignment between employee and supervisor, help improve personnel and organizational performance, assist in the intelligent allocation of scarce financial, training and other resources, reduce legal exposure and build organizational trust."

Infosys Scraps Bell Curve for Performance Evaluation
It is reassuring to see organizations moving away from the toxic practice of rank-and-yank. As Infosys and other companies have found, the collateral damage caused by rank-and-yank outweighs its dubious benefits. As the authors of an MIT white paper noted, forcing people into a rigid rank-order can cause a crippling "erosion of social capital" within the organization, precipitating an overall decline in collective performance. While I agree with that observation, I do not agree with "scrapping the bell curve". The bell curve is a useful tool and a beautiful piece of human science. What should be scrapped is its misuse in misguided schemes such as rank-and-yank.

Technology is making real-time performance monitoring too easy
"... big companies such as GE, Accenture and Deloitte are trumpeting their abandonment of the annual ritual of performance appraisal .... because it is much easier and less time-consuming to do them in real time via an app on a smartphone." Yes, but 'easier' and 'less time-consuming' does not automatically mean better, if the goal is to give considered, meaningful and useful feedback, of the type that actually leads to superior behavior.

HCL begins shift from bell curve appraisals towards feedback-based system 
Since when was the bell curve the enemy of humanity? The articles I am reading of late are incorrectly asserting that the bell curve is being abandoned. Shall we abandon the best-demonstrated piece of empirical psychology we know? Shall we abandon science? If you read the articles more closely, you will see that what is really being abandoned in most cases is the toxic practice of forced rankings. That is, rating people in such a way that the ratings distribution conforms to the bell curve shape. Forced rankings is a wrongheaded idea. But the bell curve itself is a fact, like gravity. Wrongheaded ideas come and go, but facts don't. The bell curve will continue to elegantly depict the truth of human nature.

Is the appraisal an HR tool of the past?
Vicky Roberts of UK training firm Vista asks if the recent trend towards ditching the traditional annual performance appraisal (for example, see the articles above) will become widespread. Will we all bend with the trend? No doubt, sole reliance on the once-a-year review process will be change as new technology makes new methods of feedback more timely and convenient. But it will not be the end of performance appraisal, as such. Improvement is surpassingly difficult if not impossible in the absence of appropriate feedback. As Roberts rightly writes: "Certainly the concept of an annual review of performance has its flaws, and the oft-cited reason is that nobody likes surprises. This is true, issues should of course be dealt with as they arise, not saved as a bombshell for the annual appraisal. To borrow terminology from the world of educational assessment, performance management should be formative rather than summative."

Racial discrimination or poor performance: Court decides
Here's a scenario to keep HR managers awake at night. An African American employee with allegedly poor performance, documented through a performance appraisal, was terminated after a series of warnings and probation periods. The employee goes to court and claims racial bias. The court cannot find any evidence that the people who terminated the worker were motivated by racism. But on appeal, the employee invokes a legal argument known as the cat's paw theory of liability - "under which an employer may be found liable when a non-decision-making employee with discriminatory animus provided factual information or input that may have affected the adverse employment action." In other words, the evidence relied upon by the decision-makers may have been tainted by racial animus. Hence the decision to dismiss was similarly tainted.

On the need for team lubricant
"... we learned long ago that, particularly in technology, work-progress and achieved objectives depend upon a well-lubricated team-spirit. We cannot all be experts all the time in all venues. We depend, to meet an overall task or objective, on very diverse competencies. Thus, our ability to interact with people becomes a paramount attribute..." Layfayette@Techcrunch

Appraisal: Improving Performance and Developing the Individual
Not an article, but a good read by Richard Williams (Author) and Clive Fletcher (Author)

How Human Resources Models Define The Future Organisation

Modi message to Ministers: Perform or Perish

GPMS a big leap for efficiency: PM

Current series:

The Brutal Truth About Performance Appraisal

The Wisdom of Rats, or Why Performance Appraisal Matters

Previous series:

Introduction to Performance Appraisal

The Purpose of Performance Appraisal

Methods of Performance Appraisal

Performance Rating Scales

Essay Method

Objectives Method

Benefits of Performance Appraisal

Should Appraisal be Linked to Pay and Other Reward Outcomes?

Performance Appraisal and Employee Conflict

Performance-related Bonus Schemes

Common Mistakes in Performance Appraisal

The Effect of Bias in Performance Appraisal

Legal and Ethical Issues in Performance Appraisal


Archer North & Associates

Archer North Performance Appraisal System
© 1998-2016 Archer North & Associates | Contact